EVGENIY KISELEV: IN 2018 FAS EXCLUDED OVER 979 MILLION RUB OF UNJUSTIFIED EXPENCES FORM TARIFFS

18-03-2019 | 16:03

As a result of considering 193 tariff disputes

 

The Antimonopoly Service summed up the outcome of control powers in the filed of government regulation of prices (tariffs) in 2018. For instance, FAS received 225 statements on pre-judicial tariff disputes and disagreements; overall, FAS considered 193 disputes.

 

Regarding sectoral breakdown, the “leader” is heating supply (79 statements), water supply and drainage (70), electric power industry (42), commuter passenger transportation (2).

 

“Based only these cases in 2018 FAS excluded over 979 million RUB of unjustified expenses from tariffs”, said Deputy Head of FAS Department for Regional Tariff Regulation, Evgeniy Kiselev at the hands-on workshop on “Tariff regulation under digital transformation”.  

 

At the session it was also pointed out that information about the inspections is being actualized and the amount will increase.

 

FAS representatives reminded that last year a Government Decree was passed to introduce new rules for considering tariff disputes and disagreements.  They cover such areas as heat-, water- and electric power supply, water drainage, technological connection to electric power networks, etc.

 

To consider a dispute, one of the parties must petition to FAS no later than three months after the party learned or must have learned about infringement of its rights. The antimonopoly body has 10 days to make a decision on considering the case or demising the case. Earlier, the law of the Russian Federation formalized various periods for considering pre-judicial disputes and tariff disagreements – from 30 to 90 days. Now the period for considering of all disputes by FAS will be 90 days.

 

The document formalized particular elements of the procedure designed to ensure maximum objective and comprehensive consideration of pre-judicial disputes in tariff regulation. Disputes will be considered in the presence of petitioners and defendants in pre-judicial disputes that are notified about the time and place of considering disputes 5 calendar days prior to the dispute consideration. Prior to or in the course of considering a dispute, the parties can file petitions, give explanations, and submit documents and other information that can be important in dispute consideration.

 

Under the Government Decree, the parties to disputes can take part in its consideration.

 

Based on the outcome of pre-judicial dispute consideration, the antimonopoly body makes one of the following decisions:

- Allow the claim (fully or partially)

- Dismiss the claim.

 

At the same time, the new procedure contains a norm that if in the course of dispute consideration the antimonopoly body exposes violations of the law of the Russian Federation on state regulation of tariffs (particularly, not related to the claim), the federal antimonopoly body makes a decision in view of all exposed violations.

 

In the final part of the session, FAS representatives answered the questions from regional tariff regulators on the practice of applying the new rules.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide