Arbitration Court confirmed legitimacy of the FAS decision on inadmissibility of prohibiting sale of certain types of alcohol products in the Arkhangelsk region

24-01-2013 | 10:51

On 22nd January 2012, Moscow Arbitration Court pronounced legitimacy and justification of the position of the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia) on inadmissibility of prohibiting retail sale of certain types of alcohol products in the Arkhangelsk region.

Earlier, on 20th August 2012, FAS found that the law of the Arkhangelsk region was contrary to the antimonopoly legislation. The law prohibited retail sale of alcoholic beverages the content of ethanol with 0.5% - 9% of finished products, wine beverages with the ethanol content at 1,5% - 9% of finished products, and beer-based beverages (beer drinks) in the Arkhangelsk region from 1st July 2012.

The case was initiated upon petitions of the National Association of Producers and Distributors of weak alcohol, “Moscow-Efes” Brewery” CJSC and “Tornado” Ltd.

Investigating the case, FAS established that the regional law prohibited retail sale of some types of alcohol products, circulation of which was authorized and which met mandatory government requirements and sanitary-and-epidemiological standards.

For instance, retail sale of beer drinks in the Arkhangelsk region is prohibited but beer, wine and distilled spirits can be sold.

FAS concluded that unreasonable prohibition of retail sale of certain types of alcohol products permitted for sale contradicted Part 1 Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” and Sub-Clause “b” Clause 4 Article 15 of the Law on the fundamental principles of state regulation of trading activity in the Russian Federation.

In December 2012, members of the Arkhangelsk legislature reported drafting a new regional law, which eliminates the violations registered in the FAS decision. At the same time members of the legislature exercised their legitimate right to challenge the FAS decision at Court.
 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide