Producers of explosives were caught participating in collision and fully admitted fault

04-12-2012 | 14:04

On 27th November 2012, the 9th Arbitration Appeal Court approved an amicable settlement between the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia), “Sverdlov Works” Federal State-Run Enterprise and “Promsintez” OJSC. According to the settlement agreements, the companies fully admitted violating Clause 1 Part 1 Article 11 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. The companies concluded an oral agreement that resulted in fixing prices for “Lebedinsky Mining-and-Processing Combined Works” OJSC. “Due to the specifics of government regulation of production and distribution of industrial explosives, this market has high risks of anticompetitive behavior of market participants. FAS pays special attention to compliance with the antimonopoly law in this field”, stated Deputy Head of FAS Department for Control over Industry and Defence Complex, Andrei Greshnyov. Reference: On 15th December 2011, FAS found that “Sverdlov Works” Federal State-Run Enterprise and “Promsintez” OJSC violated Clause 1 Part 1 Article 11 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. The FAS Commission concluded that simultaneously fixing prices for industrial explosives was a consequence of collusion between “Sverdlov Works” Federal State-Run Enterprise and “Promsintez” OJSC that are competitive on the market in question. On 16th July 2012, Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed the claim of “Sverdlov Works” Federal State-Run Enterprise and “Promsintez” OJSC to abolish the FAS decision. Earlier, in 2010 FAS exposed collusion between several producers of industrial explosives, including also “Sverdlov Works” Federal State-Run Enterprise and “Promsintez” OJSC. The Courts of three instances confirmed validity of the FAS decision.

Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide