Competition authorities from all over the world discussed cooperation in cartel investigation

11-05-2016 | 14:02

On 27 April 2016, the programme of the Annual Conference of the International Competition Network (ICN) in Singapore included a session of the Cartel Working Group that focused on strengthening cooperation between competition authorities. FAS experience in this field was presented by a member of the Non-Profit Partnership for Competition Support, Deputy Head of the Competition Law Department at Moscow State Law University, Denis Gavrilov.

He pointed out that FAS has accumulated significant experience of cooperation with foreign competition authorities in cartel investigations. Within the Eurasian Economic Union, to which Russia is a member, there are two levels of cooperation: directly between the competition authorities of the EAEU member-states, and between the competition authorities through the Eurasian Economic Commission. The competition authorities and EEC have possibilities to exchange confidential information, carry out joint investigations, which are an especially important and efficient tool to suppress cartels, including cross-border cartels.

FAS cooperation with competition authorities of the CIS member-states takes place under the frame of the Interstate Council on Antimonopoly Policy. To carry out joint investigations, ICAP members formed the same-name Headquarters, which analyses markets in the CIS countries, devise recommendations on improving the state of competition in such markets, and if violations are exposed, undertakes coordinated efforts to investigate the violations.

A striking example of such coordination is a roaming case investigated by FAS and Kazakhstan competition authority. Based on the case outcome, FAS found that three largest telecommunications companies abused their market dominance, and the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Competition Protection arrived to the same conclusions with regard to Kazakh companies. As a consequence of the investigation, mobile operators agreed to reduce the inter-operator rates between each other and with other operators. In the past three years the rates for voice calls went down by 9 times, SMS – by threefold, data transfer – by 44 times. Reduced rates for the communications services increased incoming and outcoming calls, SMSs and Internet-traffic.

Then Denis Gavrilov pointed out that FAS has experience of investigating antimonopoly cases with foreign colleagues outside EAEU. For example, FAS held consultations with Norway competition authority and several Norwegian companies to obtain information on the facts of collusion on the market of the Norwegian salmon import. As a result of the investigation, the FAS Commission found that 6 companies concluded an anticompetitive agreement. The fines imposed in the case reached around 3.5 million EUR. Similarly FAS had consultations with Vietnam competition body investigating collusion on the market of supplies of Vietnamese pangasius.

Finally, Denis Gavrilov said that currently there are even more incentives for cooperation between competition authorities, which can be based, particularly, on exchanging the best practices of exposing antimonopoly violations of the international nature.

As examples, Denis Gavrilov mentioned an investigation against “Google”: FAS made a decision in September 2015 года, and in April 2016 the European Commission opened a case against the company upon similar signs. In December 2015 FAS completed another investigation and that found the largest international companies operating on the market of marine container shipping violated the law by exercising anticompetitive concerted actions.  The results of this investigation can be useful for the colleagues from foreign competition authorities, first of all, in the states where similar shipping is carried out by the companies that FAS recognized as the violators.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide