Arbitration Court: “Lenta” Ltd. created discriminatory conditions for suppliers of alcohol product

19-01-2017 | 08:55

The Court dismissed a claim of the retail chain to invalidate FAS acts

In June 2016, the antimonopoly body found that “Lenta” Ltd. violated the Law on Trade (Clause 1 Part 1 Article 13).

In the FAS opinion, the retail chain created discriminatory conditions for economic entities involved in supplies of alcohol products rendering market services in 2013-2015.

For instance, the company charged suppliers of wine alcohol products differently for the same scope of slotting services and publishing information about it in the “Lenta Tovarov” catalogue.

As a result of such actions, discriminatory conditions were created for particular suppliers of alcohol products.

To support competition, FAS issued a determination to the company to eliminate the exposed violations.

FAS opened 41 administrative cases, investigating which it drew up 37 determinations on holding “Lenta” Ltd. administratively liable and imposing fines (under Part 1 Article 14.40 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations). Four administrative cases were terminated due to expired period of limitation and holding liable. The total fines reached 74 million RUB.

The company filed a lawsuit challenging the decision and determination of the antimonopoly body and the order to impose the fines. Moscow Arbitration Court, however, dismissed the claim, pronouncing legitimacy of the FAS acts.

“The Antimonopoly Service will continue monitoring enforcement of the Law on Trade. We shall not disregard practices that worsen the suppliers’ positions”, pointed out Deputy Head of FAS Legal Department, Larrisa Vovkivskaya.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide