Sergey Puzyrevskiy: FAS has formed positive legal consequences for the companies that implemented compliance in their activities

17-04-2017 | 13:40

Administrative liability for such companies will be educed by 1/8 in case of violating the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”

Deputy Head of FAS Sergey Puzyrevskiy: “We consider that corporate compliance is a system of in-house prevention of antimonopoly violations. The Antimonopoly Service drafted a law that is now under discussion at the Government of the Russian Federation and is practically ready for introducing to the State Duma of the Russian Federation”.

In the introductory remarks of the Round Table organized by the Association of Antimonopoly Experts, a branch of FAS Centre for Education and Methodics in Moscow and the Competition Law Department of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), he pointed out that the draft law contains the voluntary principle, i.e., a company decides  independently whether to introduce this system. “The result of implementing the antimonopoly compliance system is a positive legal consequence – reducing administrative liability by 1/8”, added Sergey Puzyrevskiy.

Director of a branch of FAS Centre for Education and Methodics (Moscow), Stanislav Druzhinin emphasized the importance of adopting the draft law, because the Centre constantly receives enquiries from business for training on introducing antimonopoly compliance.

Head of FAS Legal Department Artem Molchanov described compliance systems in such countries as the UK, South Korea, Brazil, etc. He also made a comparative analysis of compliance practices abroad and in Russia.

Denis Gavrilov, a representative of the Association of Antimonopoly Experts summed up the Round Table: “The workshop clearly demonstrated the importance of antimonopoly compliance. The issue generated a vivid interest of the audience. The leading Russian companies, including state-run companies, proved with their own examples that compliance programmes are sought after and can be very efficient in preventing the antimonopoly risks. No doubt that FAS law-making initiatives on formalizing antimonopoly compliance as a Russian law institution are quite timely, conform to the best world practices and are supported by business and experts”.




Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide