Arbitration Court confirmed the rightness of conclusions made by Tomsk OFAS

24-04-2017 | 10:00

The antimonopoly body found signs of violating the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” by Tomsk Regional Health Care Department

In October 2016, based on the findings of an unscheduled inspection at Tomsk Regional Forensic-and-Medical Examination Bureau, Tomsk Office of the Antimonopoly Service revealed that the budgetary institution had performed the functions of an authority in the part of forensic medical examination.

The Bureau founder is Tomsk Regional Health Care Department.

The law on state forensic medical examination does not provide for forensic medical organizations exercising any other activity apart from expert examination.

At the same time, the antimonopoly body established that Tomsk Regional Health Care Department had approved amendments to the Statute of Tomsk Regional Forensic-and-Medical Examination Bureau enabling the Bureau to offer paid funeral ceremonial services. Such services are not included in the main types of Bureau activities; therefore, the amendments to the Statute are contrary to the current law.

This situation can force citizens to enter into contracts with the Bureau for ceremonial services. It leads to breaching consumer rights to freely choose providers and to restricting and eliminating competition on the market of funeral and ceremonial services.

Tomsk OFAS found that actions by Tomsk Regional Health Care Department have signs of violating the antimonopoly law (Parts 1, 3 Article 15 the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”) and issued a warning to eliminate them by 15 November 2016.

The Health Care Department disagreed with the antimonopoly body and filed a lawsuit. Tomsk Regional Arbitration Court dismissed the claim and confirmed legitimacy of the warning issued by the antimonopoly body.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide