Andrey Tsarikovskiy discussed new aspects of establishing dominance with experts

31-10-2017 | 15:50

He looked into the latest trends and changes in studying dominance by the Antimonopoly Service, discussing the with the legal community

Stats-Secretary, Deputy Head of FAS Andrey Tsarikovskiy moderated the session on “New approaches in applying the institute of dominant entities” on 27 October at the XI Annual Conference on “Antimonopoly Regulation in Russia”.

As an example of changing approaches, he gave a so-called “peck” case – a case of a monophony and monopoly when FAS issued a warning to both sides.

“One of the goals of antimonopoly regulation is to find a certain optimum between saving resources, consumer interests and economic development”, said Deputy Head of FAS and suggested the colleagues to discuss monoposony – buyer dominance.

Answering a question, Head of FAS Department for Industry Control, Nelli Galimkhanova, who took part in the session, emphasized that buyer’s market power – is not that good and there are adverse consequences of such a  conduct.

“The law does not give a definition of monopsony, however, FAS has established its practice of conducting such investigations”, saidNelli Galimkhanova and outlined some cases completed by FAS. Such cases include a case on “large-diameter pipes” against “Gazprom” PJSC and the above mentioned “peck” case.

According to Nelli Galimkhanova, the unorthodox nature of the latter was issuing warnings to both the claimant and the petitioner.

Andrey Tsarikovskiy reminded that the situation investigated in the case, could have damaged the public at large due to the threat of developing unfvourable environmental environment, so the rationale of the intervention of the antimonopoly body had, in particular, a clear social orientation.

At the end of the session, Head of FAS pointed out the “growing need for conducting economic analysis and determining market power to establish dominance and its transition and Industry 4.0) “Perhaps, the forth economic evolution’” can lead to creating the “fifth antimonopoly package, summed up Andrey Tsarikovskiy.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide