THE COURT OF CASSATION CONFIRMED THE FACT OF THE CARTEL

18-11-2020 | 15:45

It should be recall that earlier the Vologda Regional Office of the FAS Russia proved the collusion of Rostelecom PJSC and TECHNOSERV A/S JSC when participating in a competition for the organization and implementation of the hardware and software complex Safe City in the Vologda district. TECHNOSERV A/S JSC refused to fight in favor of Rostelecom, which, not having the necessary resources to fulfill the contract, subcontracted the work to TECHNOSERV A/S JSC at a lower price, resulting in a profit of over 320 million rubles.

Disagreeing with the decision taken by the Regional Office of the  FAS Russia, the defendants appealed to the court, citing that the Vologda Regional Office of the FAS Russia had not proved the anti-competitive conspiracy, and also that they behaved in good faith during their participation in the auction.

However, the courts of three instances noted “A slight decrease in the initial maximum price, as well as further actions of Rostelecom PJSC and Technoserv A/S JSC to conclude a subcontract agreement for the performance of works that are the subject of the tender, also indicate that an agreement has been reached aimed at maintaining the price within the framework of an open competition.”

The defendants also appealed against the fines imposed by the FAS Regional Office for more than 49 million rubles, but the court of the first instance has already ordered TECHNOSERV A/S JSC to pay the fine imposed, and the court case against Rostelecom PJSC is being considered in the first instance.

1 Companies violated paragraph 2 of part 1 of article 11 of the Federal law On Protection of Competition.

2 Violators are brought to justice under part 2 of article 14.32 of the Code on Administrative Violations of the Russian Federation.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide