RACHIK PETROSYAN: GOODS MARKING SYSTEM MUST BE BENEFICIAL TO CONSUMERS AND USED TO OPTIMIZE BUSINESS OPERATIONS

12-12-2018 | 15:37

The marking costs can be paid off by times through reduced expenses and increased sales

 

Representatives of business and the authorities discussed the government strategy for marking goods. In 2017, a decision was made to form the national system for digital marking and tracing of goods. In April 2018, the list of goods for primary mandatory marking was issued.

 

Opening a discussion at the Conference on “Marking: the Fair Business Digital Code”, Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, Maxim Akimov, outlined the basic principles of the marking system.

 

Deputy Head of FAS Rachik Petrosyan explained FAS position on the procedure for access to the information aggregated by the marking system, the regulation conditions and capabilities of the site.

 

“Today the marking system is being developed as a public information system on the public-private partnership principles, and its success, including commercial success of the system operator, to a considerable extent depends on whether the operator manages to make it popular among consumers and businessmen, to whom the system must open opportunities for business optimization, particularly, in the part of logistics and marketing. It will allow to pay off the costs of business for marking due to reducing the expenses and increasing sales”, said Rachik Petrosyan.

 

He pointed out that the system data should be provided on a non-discriminatory basis – on equal conditions for all participants.

 

 

Background:

FAS has formed a broad practice of considering cases on discrimination in the course of information access. Abuses in this field are committed in various markets by both companies and the authorities that limit access to informational systems in a certain way or provide it under non-transparent conditions.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide