Court pronounced legitimacy of FAS warning issued to the St Petersburg Government in the course of investigating an antimonopoly case

30-09-2016 | 17:52

On 28 September 2016, Moscow Arbitration Court confirmed legitimacy of the warning of the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia) issued to St Petersburg Government to terminate actions (omissions) that have elements of violating Part 1 Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.

Investigating an antimonopoly case open upon a claim of “CardioClinic” CJSC, FAS exposed elements of violations: St Petersburg Government failed to adopt measures in order to create conditions aimed at non-discriminatory distribution of medical care under the frame of the regional mandatory medical insurance programme for St Petersburg. FAS decided to issue a warning guided by the “forth antimonopoly package”.

To execute the warning, by 25 April 2016 St Petersburg Government had to devise and implement the mechanism of distributing medical care under the regional mandatory medical insurance programme that provides for the objective criteria of distributing medical care on non-discriminatory conditions.

St Petersburg Government did not voluntarily eliminate the signs of the violations suspected by the antimonopoly authority and filed a lawsuit challenging the warning at Arbitration Court. Moscow Arbitration Court, however, confirmed legitimacy and reasonableness of the position taken by the antimonopoly body.

“Liberalizing the antimonopoly law under the “forth antimonopoly package” that came into force, FAS issued a warning to St Petersburg Government. Unfortunately, the respondent did not take an advantage of the opportunity to voluntarily eliminate the signs of the violation exposed by FAS”, pointed out the Head of FAS Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade, Timofey Nizhegorodtsev.

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide