Vitaly Korolev: FAS intends that consumers obtain an integrated product to get resources

15-03-2017 | 17:26

Deputy Head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service discussed measures in technological connection to the electric power supply that enabled the Russian Federation to get to the 29 position in the Doing Business ranking

Deputy Head of FASVitaly Korolev was a speaker at the “Increasing accessibility of the energy infrastructure: from metropolitan cities’ experience to the new standards for Russia” session of Russian Investment Forum in Sochi.

It was pointed out that in the current economic situation enhancing accessibility of the energy infrastructure is getting increasingly important for business as well for the state in general.  

Thanks to the ongoing efforts towards improving the regulatory framework and implementing the “Road Map” on enhancing accessibility of the energy infrastructure, Russia was able to move 135 points up in the international World Bank ranking - Doing Business – on the indicator of accessibility of connecting to the electric power supply system (the 29th position).

According to Vitaly Korolev, this indicator is an accumulative effect of the processes started in 2004.

“For instance, in December 2004 Russia for the first time adopted the Rules for non-discriminatory access to the services on electric power transmission and technological connection. This is the first milestone in the new development of the electric power industry in Russia”, added Deputy Head of FAS. “The next stage of development was approving the Plan in 2011 to ensure accessibility and make cheaper technological connection for all categories of the population and now all those measures enabled such a significant advancement in the ranking”.  

“Accessibility of technological connection for consumers is an important task. And it is in the electric power industry that the Russian Federation has achieved the most advancement: a consumer approaches a grid company and as a result gets a power supply contract. The Antimonopoly Service ensures the fact that there will be no imposing of services. If a consumer does not want to obtain a service from the provider of last resort, the consumer indicates the market participant from whom he wants to obtain it”, explained Vitaly Korolev.  

“Thus, at the time of technological connection the consumer receives a full package of services, offering everything and immediately, and a grid company gets a consumer that that does not have non-contractual consumption”, emphasized Vitaly Korolev.

Deputy Head of FAS also covered support to small and medium business. As specified at the session, technological connection for a consumer can be practically free-of-charge, but later an individual tariff should be set for the consumer.

“Earlier FAS already proposed this mechanism. Thus, consumers have a choice: either get fringe benefits entering the market and then the tariff will be high, or a consumer pays for full connection and then gets a tariff together with all market participants. It is expedient to implement the tariffs if grid companies are prepared to fulfill the so-called “bank function”, when they credit consumers due to a higher tariff and get back repayment”, concluded Vitaly Korolev.

Reference:

The event attendees included:

Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation, Alexander Novak

Governor of the Murmansk region, Marina Kovtun

President of “OPORA Russia” All-Russian NGO of small and medium business, Alexander Kalinin  

General Director of the Russian Direct Investments Fund, Kirill Dmitriev

Deputy Board Chairman, “Gazprom” PJSC, Valery Golubev

General Director, Board Chairman, “Rosset” PJSC, Oleg Budargin

Senior Partner, McKinsey & Company, Stepan Solzhenitsyn.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide