The 14th Arbitration Appeal Court supported decision of Vologda OFAS with regard to “VOEK” JSC

07-06-2017 | 13:50

“Vologda Regional Energy Company” JSC unlawfully refused to conclude a contract for temporary technological connection

In October 2016 Vologda OFAS found that “Vologda Regional Energy Company” JSC(“VOEK” JSC) had committed an administrative violation under Part 1 Article 9.21 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations and imposed 100,000 RUB administrative fine upon the company.

Vologda OFAS received a petition from “Vologdastroi” Ltd. that “VOEK” JSC had violated the Rules for technological connection of power-receiving devices of consumers of electric power, power-generating facilities as well as power grid facilities, possessed by network organizations and other persons, to electric networks. The Rules are approved by No. 861 Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 27.12.2004 (for temporary technological connection).

On 28 June 2016, “Vologdastroi” Ltd. filed an application for temporary connection of energy receiving devices (electrical distribution panels) on a construction site of residential houses under construction.

In response, “VOEK” JSC recommended “Vologdastroi” Ltd. to apply for temporary connection of energy receiving devices only after concluding a contract for permanent power supply. As a result, Vologda OFAS concluded “Vologda Regional Energy Company” JSC unreasonably refused to conclude a contract for temporary technological connection.  Thus, “VOEK” JSC committed an administrative violation under Part 1 Article 9.21 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations. The antimonopoly body issued an injunction to fine “VOEK” JSC 100,000 RUB.

The network company disagreed with the decision and injunction of Vologda OFAS and filed a lawsuit heard at Court of First Instance and the Appeal Court.

On 30 May 2017, the 14th Arbitration Appeal Court, after the Court of the First Instance confirmed legitimacy of the position taken by the antimonopoly body.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide