ST Petersburg FAS fined violators of allocating mandatory medical insurance funds in St Petersburg 240,000 RUB

17-07-2017 | 08:47

Officials of St Petersburg Government and the Commission for a regional mandatory medical insurance programme are fined for violating the antimonopoly law  

FAS finalized a series of antimonopoly investigations, where it established a list of violators of the antimonopoly law in allocating mandatory medical insurance funds in St Petersburg.

Earlier FAS found that St Petersburg Government and the Commission for a regional mandatory medical insurance programme in St Petersburg had violated Clause 8 Part 1 Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” as a result of discriminating economic entities when devising the regional mandatory medical insurance programme.

The violators appealed the decision and injunction of the antimonopoly (Nos. 18/43703/16 and 18/43702/16); however, the Court of First Instance and the Appeal Court confirmed legitimacy and reasonableness of FAS conclusions.  

As a result of the investigations, 16 officials of the St Petersburg Commission, who voted for the Commission making decisions in breach of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”, are held administratively liable.

St Petersburg Vice-Governor was also fined for omissions of St Petersburg Government in the part of creating discriminatory conditions for providing high technology medical care.  

Deputy Head of FAS Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade, Maxim Degtyaryov emphasized: “Officials of all Mandatory Insurance Commissions in any subjects of the Russian Federation should understand that allocating the volumes of medical care without taking objective criteria, market participants needs and opportunities into account always has a risk of creating discriminatory conditions and can lead to restricting competition. At the same time, participation in the work of the collegial body does not exonerate personal responsibility emerging at the time of voting for relevant decisions”.

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide