Court supported a decision on the most mass-scale cartel

04-08-2017 | 08:06

Moscow Arbitration Court pronounced legitimacy of the FAS decision on a bid-rigging cartel case for supplies of military uniforms and gear for the needs of the Ministry of Interior, the Federal Security Service and the Federal Customs Service
The scope of the exposed cartel is unprecedented: more than 90 legal entities are found guilty.
The investigation revealed that the bid-rigging cartel participants took part in 18 open electronic auctions for the total amount exceeding 3.5 billion RUB.
The cartel members developed a system of “quotas”, calculated in view of the initial contract price pro rata to the number of auction participants. “Quotas” could be obtained, exchanged or accumulated. Upon accumulating a particular amount of “quotas” and reaching arrangements with other cartel participants, one of the cartel members could become a “contract holder” on an auction.
Deputy Head of FAS Anti-Cartel Department, Mukhamed Mamukov added: “The cartel controlled the organized “quota system” through regular information exchange. The evidence was discovered by FAS in the course of unscheduled inspections at companies’ offices”.
The evidence on entering and participating in the cartel agreement also includes confessions from some respondents, given under FAS leniency programme.
FAS made a decision on the case on violating Clause 2 Part 1 Article 11 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” and fined the violators more than 606 million RUB in total. The first company that admitted its participation in the cartel was relieved from administrative liability. Three more companies were imposed the minimal fines.
45 legal entities disagreed with the FAS decision and filed a lawsuit. Moscow Arbitration Court supported the position of the antimonopoly authority and dismissed the companies’ claim.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide