Igor Artemiev: the world is changing right before our eyes

20-09-2017 | 08:45

Head of FAS said that economic globalization and digitalization are the main challenges of our time

Head of the antimonopoly body was a speaker at the session on “Antimonopoly policy: important approaches and trends” on 15 September 2017 at Kazan Legal 2017 International Forum. He emphasized that FAS powers on tariff regulation, public procurement and public defence procurement jointly with classic functionalities of the antimonopoly body created synergy aimed at developing competition in all fields.

Igor Artemiev pointed out that the market of attorney services in antimonopoly regulation is flourishing. At the same time tariffs, public procurement, and public defence procurement have not attracted due attention of the legal community, in spite of enormous opportunities in those fields and the need for attorneys.

Outlining the newest economic trends, he pointed out: “The world is changing right before our eyes, legislation is hopelessly obsolete. We need to form new judicial practice and ensure new legal and regulatory framework”.

Discussing globalization of the modern economy, Head of the antimonopoly body stated that analyzing global deals that touch the interests of many jurisdictions require consolidation of the efforts of the antimonopoly authorities and creating new supranational systems”.

He reminded that FAS is now considering such global deals as “Yandex. Taxi” and “Uber” merger in Russia and “Bayer” purchasing “Monsanto”.

Igor Artemiev presented FAS antimonopoly cases against such transnational companies as “Google”, “Microsoft”, and “Apple”. “The most important in the “Google” case was to balance the intellectual property rights and antimonopoly regulation. Undoubtedly, the rights of creators should be protected; at the same time, we should not allow them abusing their dominance”.

He also reminded of the idea of global benchmarking to be used to form price platforms. The antimonopoly bodies from all countries will be able to follow up prices on comparable markets and suppress violations.

Talking about digitalization as a challenge to antimonopoly control, Igor Artemiev said that state-of-the-art technologies are also used to breach the law, for instance, to organize cartels. Regarding use of robots for “leveling” prices, he mentioned: “There is a tentative fine line: companies certainly should observe the pricing policies of their competitors, however, if they set robots to automatically maintain high prices – is constitutes a violation”.

He specially discussed dependence of the costs of goods or services on previous searches, purchases by a user or the user’s financial level: “We suspect now that ordering goods or services from a more modern and expensive phone model, the price sometimes is higher that when ordering from a simpler phone”.

As a prospective area of FAS work, Head of the antimonopoly authority emphasized “uberization” of the economy – creating aggregator platforms that reduce costs and remove intermediaries from economic relations. As a successful example, he gave a joint project with “Russian Railways”, when the nearest car is sent to the ordering party, which reduces empty car mileage and eliminates excessive administrative barriers.

He added that FAS introduced the blockchain technology in workflow management and database keeping and stressed that this technology cannot be controlled from outside so it “will always show correct prices”.  Igor Artemiev concluded: “If we created such global databases to be used in analytics in all countries, violations would be impossible, the world would not be distorted and people’s life would become significantly easier”.

Head of FAS has asked a number of questions to Charles McConnel, a senior correspondent of “Global Competition Review”, about his recommendations as to how to improve FAS position in the global ranking of competition authorities.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Media Releases Image Library About the FAS Russia What We Do General Information Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Global Competition Review Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents The BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre (BRICS Competition Centre) BRICS Working Groups for the research of competition issues in socially important markets The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Chair: Russia The Working Group for Research on food value chains Chair: South Africa The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Co-chaired: India, South Africa The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Digital Markets Co-chairs: Brazil, Russia BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Archive Working Group on Investigating Issues on Pricing in the Oil and Oil Product Markets and Methods of their Functioning Meetings Working Group for Studying Competition Problems in the Pharmaceutical Sector Working Group on Research of Competition Issues in the Market of International Telecommunications (Roaming) Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide