CASSATION COURT PRONOUNCED LEGITIMACY OF FAS WARNING TO TVER AUTHORITY

22-11-2017 | 09:33

The local authority attempted to assign the functions of a budget holder to an economic entity

 

Tver Authority passed a Decree [1], establishing the procedure of granting subsidies to non-profit organizations. Under the procedure, a non-profit organization (grant operator) could be determined on the tender outcome and assigned the powers for independent selection of other non-profit organizations and granting subsidies from the local budget.

 

Based on the results of a tender, recognized void die to the single bid, Tver Authority approached the antimonopoly body to obtain consent for granting a municipal preference - a 3,300,000 RUB subsidy to the grant operator – the “Institute of Regional Development” Association towards Civil Society Development. The Association was supposed to spend the money on tenders and give grants to other non-profit organizations.

 

FAS found that those actions had signs of violating the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” [2], since budgetary funds in the form of subsidies (grants) are provided and their use is controlled exclusively by the authorities and local self-government bodies. Delegating these powers to any other persons, particularly, non-profit organizations, non-specified in the Budget Code of the Russian Federation and the federal laws is no allowed.

 

Based on the above, FAS issued a warning to Tver Authority to stop actions (omissions) that had signs of violating the antimonopoly law.

 

Tver Authority filed a lawsuit against issuing the warning by the antimonopoly body. Courts of three instances, however, confirmed legitimacy of the regulator’s actions. The Decree of Tver Authority is abolished, which means that the FAS warning is executed.

 

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Media Releases Image Library About the FAS Russia What We Do General Information Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Global Competition Review Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents The BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre (BRICS Competition Centre) BRICS Working Groups for the research of competition issues in socially important markets The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Chair: Russia The Working Group for Research on food value chains Chair: South Africa The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Co-chaired: India, South Africa The Working Group for Research on the Competition Issues in the Digital Markets Co-chairs: Brazil, Russia BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Archive Working Group on Investigating Issues on Pricing in the Oil and Oil Product Markets and Methods of their Functioning Meetings Working Group for Studying Competition Problems in the Pharmaceutical Sector Working Group on Research of Competition Issues in the Market of International Telecommunications (Roaming) Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide