“PRODUCT CASE” OF THE FEDERAL PENITENTIARY SERVICE IS IN THE TOP-10 FAS CASES IN 2018

24-06-2019 | 14:24

Detainees should have access to goods at the prices similar to the retail market

 

Fulfilling the rights of the individuals in custody for purchasing food products and the essentials at reasonable prices – is an important element of the entire penitentiary system. In particular, it enables to maintain its humane appearance. In 2015-2017, however, as a result of anticompetitive actions undertaken by the Federal Penitentiary Service, the suspects and accused kept in pretrial wards in Moscow were deprived of this right. Their numerous complaints as well as complaints from their relatives regarding unreasonably overrated prices in the stores located in the territories of penal facilities triggered a relevant reaction from the Antimonopoly Service. This case, investigated by the Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade is in the top-10 of FAS Central Office in 2018.

 

Earlier, the Federal Penitentiary Service changed the system of organizing sale of food products, the essentials as well as other manufactured goods for the needs of the suspects and the accused. For instance, sales organization was allocated exclusively to “Kaluzhskoe” Federal State Unitary Enterprise of the Federal Penitentiary Service. It reduced the range of suppliers, market closure for other economic entities except the enterprise and subsequently led to unreasonably overrated prices.

 

The Antimonopoly Service found that the Federal Penitentiary Service violated Part 1 Article 15 of No.135-FZ Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” of 26.07.2006. FAS issued a warning to the Federal Penitentiary Service to terminate the violations and exercise actions aimed at competition support. In spite of the attempts to challenge the decision and the order on the case by the Federal Penitentiary Service, the FAS position was supported by all Court instances, including the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide