PRICE CAP WILL ENABLE LONG-TERM, FLEXIBLE AND PREDICTABLE TARIFF REGULATION

28-08-2019 | 11:08

Drafting and implementing price caps to estimate regulated tariffs for of public telecommunications and postal services is one of the best achievement of sectoral units of FAS Central Office 2018

Deputy Head of FAS Anatoly Golomolzin commented: “Price cap is an advanced, stimulating tariff regulation. It is an intermediary stage for deregulating communications services. This approach enables the necessary long-tem, flexible and predictable tariff regulation”.

Price cap can be used not only in communications but also in other regulated sectors.

Price cap applies after regulated tariffs reach the level of economically justified costs in view of the standard profit. Price cap allows gaining profit from efficient costs management, or “inflation minus”.

The regulator sets the maximum (“cup”) price or tariff value for the service of a regulated company or the maximum (“cup”) value of the tariff changing index for a group of services for a new regulatory period, based on the expected inflation level and increasing efficiency of the company and the economy in general, or in other words, “inflation-Х-factor”.

Head of FAS Department for Regulating Communications and Information technologies, Elena Zaeva, pointed out: “Substantively, X–factor is an expected rate of an operator’s performance efficiency increase in general. Х-factor must stimulate operators to enhance efficiency to a particular base level in the economy in general. Otherwise stated, X–factor is a benchmarking mechanism in terms of efficient use of resources and the rates of efficiency improvement”.

Cup price advantages include such factors as financial stimulation of producers to improve efficiency, transparency and simplicity of calculating Х-factor and the cup price throughout long-term regulatory periods. Х-factor is overall estimated based on corporate data in order to obtain comparable data. The operator’s data are compared with data on the economy in general. The economy serves as the benchmark.

 

“The higher is the operator’s efficiency over the general economic efficiency, the lower is the Х-factor and, accordingly, the higher is a coefficient for the maximum tariff increase. Thus, companies are stimulated for performance improvement and innovative development”, added Elena Zaeva.

Price cup in tariff regulation is a mechanism that works for a competitive market, “engaging” communications operators in the market conduct conditions, that is either in the state of competition or close to it, in tariff policy setting.

Elena Zaeva concluded: “Communications operators are given the right to determine on their own the tariff changing indices within a set of services based on consumer conduct and corporate goals. The main motivation for regulating using price restrictions is, on the one hand, stimulating cost reductions, which results in increasing the profit that communications operators keep, and on the other – curbing tariff growth for consumers”.

In June 2019, FAS applied cup price to approve regulated tariffs for “Rostelecom” PJSC.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide