EVOLUTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR CARTELS

25-09-2019 | 17:18

Representatives of the antimonopoly authority, law enforcement bodies and the legal community met at the II Eurasian Cartel Forum to discuss development of the criminal law in the part of competition protection and enforcement practice

 

Head of FAS Anti-Cartel Department Andrey Tenishev explained the changes to Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation during its history: “First everything was put in Article 178: unfair competition, bid-rigging collusion, anticompetitive agreements. Then some of the norms were removed, including liability for collusion with government customers – tender organizers, which definitely is a more dangerous crime”.

 

In his opinion, not only Article 178 protects competition: practice shows that abuse of office, bribery, embezzlement and other formal elements of crime are used in sentencing.

 

“Any “white-collar” criminal weighs all pros and contras before committing an offence. If there no risk to be caught red-handed, there are no obstacles to violate the law. If he counts a fine for collusion and understands that there still is profit – it also does not deter from a criminal act. This kind of persons can be stopped by a threat of actual criminal liability for 7 years imprisonment. Otherwise, no fines can stop them”, emphasized Andrey Tenishev.

 

Head of FAS Anti-Cartel Department described a draft law that tighten liability for cartels, which is submitted to the parliament: “We are returning a special norm for collusion between ordering parties and bidders, separate the norms for cartels operating on the markets and bid-rigging cartels, remove the “competition restriction” element as cartels are violations per se – it a presumption which is not necessary to prove”.

 

There also will be a Register of cartel participants who are debarred from taking part in tenders and auctions; liability for recidivism; and declaration of awareness about liability for participating in cartels by bidders.

 

At the end of the session, talking about enforcement of the “criminal” Article 178 and FAS work with the law enforcement bodies, Andrey Tenishev emphasized: “What has happened is a breakthrough”.

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide