ARBITRATION COURT CONFIRMED LEGITIMACY OF A DECISION MADE BY SARATOV OFAS

26-09-2019 | 16:02

The latter allocated subsidies to unlawfully compensate the costs for repair and maintenance of power lines for outdoor lightening

 

Earlier Saratov OFAS found that Saratov Authority violated the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. The latter passed a Decree to unlawfully grant subsidies in order to compensate the costs of upkeep, maintenance and routine repair of municipal cable and overhead power transmission lines for outdoor lightening.

 

The case was opened upon recommendations from Saratov Regional Prosecutor’s Office.

 

Investigating the case, the FAS Commission found that following the Decree, Saratov Authority had been granting subsidies to compensate the costs of upkeep, maintenance and routine repair of power lines for outdoor lightening. Since such works are considered of local significance, their financing should be executed in line with the Law on contractual system. Saratov Authority, however, failed to organize competitive bidding, and granted a 50-million RUB subsidy to a single entity – “Sargorsvet” Municipal Unitary Enterprise.

 

Saratov OFAS issued a warning to Saratov Authority to stop actions (omissions) that contain elements of violating Part 1 Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.

 

As Saratov Authority failed to undertake the measures within the deadline to restore the lawful conditions, OFAS opened proceedings against it upon signs of violating the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” and found that Saratov Authority breached Part 1 Article 15 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.

 

Saratov Authority disagreed with the decision of Saratov OFAS and attempted to appeal. Courts of three instances, however, dismissed the claim and supported the OFAS decision.

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide