FAS FOUND THAT NAZYVAEVSKY GRAIN ELEVATOR VIOLATED THE ANTIMONOPOLY LAW

27-02-2020 | 18:17

The company abused its market dominance and fixed monopolistically high price for grain shipping

 

The FAS Commission fond that “Nazyvaevsky Grain Elevator” OJSC had violated the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”1. The company fixed a monopolistically high price for shipping grain purchased with material assets from state stockpiles.

 

The case was opened upon a statement from “Agro Vita” JSC that had signed a grain buying-and-selling contract with Rosrezerv [the Federal State Reserve Agency] based on the result of competitive bidding for sale of material assets from state stockpiles. “Nazyvaevsky Grain Elevator” OJSC is the grain delivery basis in accord with the contract.

 

The FAS Commission established that Nazyvaevsky Grain Elevator used its dominance 2 and fixed a monopolistically high price for “Agro Vita” JSC for grain storage and shipping by road and rail. The price exceeded the sum of the costs of profit required to provide these services, as well as price formed in competitive conditions on a comparable market. As a result, “Agro Vita” JSC could not execute the buying-and-selling contract with Rosrezerv and had to terminate it.

 

FAS issued a binding order to “Nazyvaevsky Grain Elevator” OJSC. Within ten days, the company must either make amendments or withdraw the order that fixed the monopolistically high price.

 

1 Clause 1 Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. Liability for such violations is specified in Part 1 Article 14.31 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations. The fine can be from 300,000 RUB to 1 million RUB.

2 On the market of services for storing and shipping grain purchased with material assets from state stockpiles, and put in a depositary.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide