13-04-2020 | 02:24

On 8 April, FAS sent a letter to the Association of Online Retailers advising to take into consideration factors that can create storage, panic buying, increase prices for the essential goods in the course of commercial operations of online-services and e-commerce marketplaces


In the current difficult sanitary-and-epidemiological situation, the Government of the Russian Federation is undertaking significant steps aimed at stabilizing prices for socially important food products and essential non-food items.


At the same time, FAS is receiving complaints from retail chains and physical persons about the facts of reselling goods, typically by individual entrepreneurs that purchase goods in retail chains via advertising online-services and e-commerce marketplaces.


In FAS opinion, such actions in a short-run can generate panic buying in retail chains, lead to unreasonable increases of prices for particular groups of goods and depletion of cheap assortments of these goods in retail outlets, making them unaffordable for most segments of the population in self-isolation, and develop a negative perception by people with regard of operations of particular marketplaces as well as e-commerce in general.


Such actions are contrary to the measures undertaken by the Government of the Russian Federation and executive bodies to stabilize prices for consumer goods.


The Federal Antimonopoly Service cannot apply antimonopoly remedies to such economic entities, since  FAS intervention in price-setting by actors on unregulated markets is possible only if companies have the dominant position on the relevant markets and if market players enter in anticompetitive agreements or exercise anticompetitive actions.


At the same time, FAS recommends that exercising commercial operations, online services and e-commerce marketplaces should take into consideration factors that can create shortage, generate panic buying and increase prices for essential goods, and come up with reasonable measures to prevent such conduct. Adopting adequate measures by companies will not be qualified by FAS as violating the norms of the antimonopoly law.

Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Media Releases Image Library About the FAS Russia What We Do General Information Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Institutional Memory Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings GCR Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements International Working Groups Working Group on Research of Competition Issues in the Market of International Telecommunications (Roaming) Meetings Working Group for Studying Competition Problems in the Pharmaceutical Sector Concept Note Meetings OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 13th session IGE UNCTAD Resolution Russian contributions 14th session IGE UNCTAD Resolution Russian contributions 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy BRICS Working Groups for the research of competition issues in socially important markets Cooperation within the BRICS BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Archive Working Group on Investigating Issues on Pricing in the Oil and Oil Product Markets and Methods of their Functioning Meetings Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide COVID-19