Highway machinery must not be provided without

19-09-2013 | 13:54

On 16th September 2013, the 11th Arbitration Appeal Court (Samara) pronounced legitimacy of a decision and determination issued by the Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service in the Ulyanovsk region (Ulyanovsk OFAS Russia) to the Committee of Road Facilities, Capital Improvement and Transport, at Ulyanovsk City Authority on unlawfully granted state and municipal preference.

The Committee violated the law by granting from 1st May 2012 highway equipment “Ulyanovskdorrembytservice” Municipal Unitary Enterprise for the free use without competitive bidding. The equipment was purchased by Ulyanovsk Authority for the price over 569 million Rubles. The Committee failed to exercise actions to return the property, thus, putting “Ulyanovskdorrembytservice” Municipal Unitary Enterprise in an advantageous position on the market, which, in its turn, could have resulted in preventing, restricting or eliminating competition.

Ulyanovsk OFAS Russia issued a determination to the Committee of Road Facilities, Capital Improvement and Transport, at Ulyanovsk City Authority to stop violating the antimonopoly law by withdrawing highway machinery from “Ulyanovskdorrembytservice” Municipal Unitary Enterprise.

The Committee disagreed with the decision and determination issued by the antimonopoly body and filed a lawsuit. However, the 11th Arbitration Appeal Court pronounced legitimacy of the actions undertaken by Ulyanovsk OFAS Russia.

“OFAS watches how state and municipal preferences are granted. We are glad that the Court confirmed legitimacy of our decision. We call to everyone to comply with the antimonopoly law and do not violate the law granting state preference”, commented Deputy Head of Ulyanovsk OFAS Russia, Constantine Popov.

 



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide