FAS opened a case upon signs of a bid-rigging cartel for supplies of food products for the needs of military training schools

11-02-2016 | 15:50

The Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia) opened a case against several economic entities (1) upon signs of a bid-rigging cartel for supplies of food products for the needs of military training schools and special educational institutions under public defence procurement. The case was opened upon materials obtained by FAS in the course of unscheduled field inspections.

Having analyzed the obtained information, FAS established that to be awarded the government contracts at the highest possible price, the above economic entities reached an anticompetitive agreement. The cartel participants imitated competition among them and applied the “ramming” model at the auctions (2), as a result of which bona fide bidders refused to continue filing their price offers. The antimonopoly body also established that the cartel participants operated from the same address, used the same IP-address to file their bids and price offers, and the same persons prepared the first parts of the bids for several parties to the agreement.  

The actions of the legal entity and entrepreneurs have elements of violating Clause 2 Part 1 Article 11 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” (concluding an anticompetitive agreement that led or could have led to increasing, reducing or maintaining prices during auctions).

“Unscheduled inspections remain one of the most efficient methods of exposing anticompetitive agreements. Cartel participants are aware of this and typically they strongly oppose the inspectors. Practice shows, however, that such conduct pattern does not help them to conceal the facts and escape liability for the committed violations”, emphasized the Head of FAS Department for Control and Inspection in Public Defence Procurement, Konstantin Alyoshin.

References:

  1. 1.     “Tsentr-Invest” Ltd. and individual entrepreneurs Burykina, Serova, Mal’chikhina, Sitkina, Grinyova and Panteleeva.
  2. 2.     “Ramming” - a conduct pattern at auctions applied by unfair bidders to eliminate competition and ensure that one of the cartel participants would win. Within a short period of time two of the cartel participants take turns to reduce the lot price significantly until they see that bona fide auction bidders, misled by this conduct strategy of their rivals, refuse to continue to compete. Then at the last second of the auction the third cartel participant offer its price slightly lower that the price offered by the bona fide auction bidders. Nowadays the Federal Antimonopoly Service and trading sites are able to promptly expose “ramming”.


Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide