Moscow Arbitration Court supported FAS position in a case on a bid-rigging cartel for reconstructing Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Clinic

15-02-2016 | 16:26

Moscow Arbitration Courtpronounced legitimacy and reasonableness ofthe decision of the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS Russia) on a case against “Medkon” Ltd., “Sibagropromstroi” Shareholding Company, “UNIX” Medical Company” Ltd., “Monolitstroi” Ltd. and fully supported the arguments and submissions from the antimonopoly authority.

In June 2015 FAS found that “Medkon” Ltd., “Sibagropromstroi” Shareholding Company, “UNIX” Medical Company” Ltd., “Monolitstroi” Ltd. violated Clause 2  Part 1 Article 11 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. FAS established that the companies concluded an anticompetitive agreement to maintain prices at an open auction for the works to reconstruct Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Clinic. To this purpose, two participants of the prohibited agreement acquired 50% shares of a third organization each and determined a model of conduct for this organization at the tender. When the tender was over they subcontracted some of the works under the government contract to their competitors.

“For the first time in judicial practice on bid-rigging cartels the Court recognized legitimacy of holding liable not only the bidders but also the companies that used an operating company to implement the anticompetitive agreement”, pointed out the Head of FAS Anti-Cartel Department, Andrey Filimonov.

“The Court confirmed FAS conclusions on the anticompetitive agreement in the course of the tender and execution of the government contract. All participants of the agreement are held administratively liable”, said the Head of FAS Anti-Cartel Department, Andrey Tenischev. “In its turn, FAS will continue its efforts on exposing cartels in construction”.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide