Kaliningrad Arbitration Court supported OFAS in a dispute with “Natsrybresource”

16-09-2016 | 10:57

On 2 September 2016, Kaliningrad Regional Arbitration Courtdismissed a claim of the “National Fish Resources” Federal State Unitary Enterprise (“Natsrybresource”) and pronounced legitimacy of the decision made by Kaliningrad OFAS.

Earlier the antimonopoly body found that “Natsrybresource” had been unlawfully setting and charging tariffs for the services of Pionersky remote sea terminal (Clause 10 Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”).

Kaliningrad Transport Prosecutor’s Office forwarded a statement of the Chairman of the Fishermen Trade Union to OFAS to verify legitimacy of the tariffs for moorage in Pionersky seaport set by the Kaliningrad branch of “Natsrybresource”.

The antimonopoly body established: being a natural monopoly “Natsrybresource” in breach of Part 1 Article 18 of the Federal Law “On Seaports in the Russian Federation”, without approaching a competent body to set the tariff (charges) and determining the measurement unit to which it applies, independently passed an order on 27.08.2014 to approve the tariffs for mooring services at berths in Pionersky remote sea terminal. Such actions are unlawful and economically unjustified since prices and tariffs for the services of a natural monopoly are subject to government regulation through setting the list of works (goods, services) of natural monopolies, the prices (tariffs) for which are regulated by the state, and an economic entity does not have the powers to independently, using a particular method, fix the size of charges and the charging procedure, and charge them in the absence of а statutory port charges.

OFAS Commission found that actions of “Natsrybresource” in breach of Part 1 Article 18 of the Federal Law “On Seaports in the Russian Federation” in the part of fixing and charging tariffs for the services of a remote Pionersky sea terminal rendered by natural monopolies also violated Clause 10 Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”. Upon the fact of the violation, OFAS issued a warning to terminate the violation by 01.06.2016. The persons guilty of committing the antimonopoly violation shall be held administratively liable.

On 2 September 2016, Kaliningrad Regional Arbitration Courtmade a judgment on the claim of “Natsrybresource” against Kaliningrad OFAS.

“In the course of judicial proceedings “Natsrybresource” attempted to prove to the Court, as earlier to the antimonopoly body, that it was not a natural monopoly, but the Court did not find the presented arguments convincing and pronounce the reasonableness of the decision and determination made by Kaliningrad OFAS. It is another decision in support of Kaliningrad fishermen”, pointed out the Head of Kaliningrad OFAS Olga Bobrova.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide