Nadezhda Sharavskaya summed up the intermediary results of FAS efforts in regulating prices for vital medicinal drugs

09-12-2016 | 13:24

Speaking at the International Business Medical-and-Pharmaceutical Forum, Deputy Head of FAS Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade, Nadezhda Sharavskaya, said that after transferring the powers of the Federal Tariff Service to the Federal Antimonopoly Service, FAS had considered 3500 draft ceiling ex-works prices for medicinal drugs, of which 3460 draft prices were approved.

“Overall, FAS has granted nearly 65% petitions for registering ceiling prices. At the same time, a lot of them are refused or returned to the Ministry of Health Care for the procedure to make changes to the Price Register without economic analysis. We are actively developing judicial practice on price registration – FAS has already won 9 proceedings. When companies disagree with the price decisions, they can appeal them because only Courts can confirm legitimacy of the actions of the antimonopoly authority or the Ministry of Health Care”, emphasized Nadezhda Sharavskaya.

Deputy Head of FAS Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade also discussed the work of the antimonopoly body upon the results of the Stage I of an international analysis of medicinal drug prices. FAS revealed overrated prices for 48 drugs from the list of vital and essential drugs in comparison with the prices for the same drugs, identified by the antimonopoly body in the reference countries. 3 foreign countries decided not to wait for the outcome of the investigation and voluntarily decreased prices for 12 drug. Russian drug manufacturers also joined the price reduction initiative.

“To improve price registration, today we should form a simple and “transparent” mechanism of decision-making on price registration and move to using the indicative method of pricing, fully rejecting the costs method”, clarified Nadezhda Sharavskaya.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide