Oleg Korneev: unifying the procedure of “for disposal” tenders will reduce abusing

26-10-2017 | 17:11

There are several concerns regarding disposal of the property of state and municipal unitary enterprises without competitive bidding and by-passing the Law on privatization through deposits in share-holding companies

On 19 October 2017 the Committee of the State Duma on Natural resources, Property and Land Relations “On the issues of implementing the national policy in management and privatization of federal property” discussed priority areas of law-making, with regard to enhancing efficiency of federal property management, and some legislative proposals on improving regulations over this field of property relations.

FAS was represented by Head of FAS Department for Construction and Natural Resources Oleg Korneev.

He outlined the present concerns with disposal of the property of state and municipal unitary enterprises with out tenders and by-passing the Law on privatization through deposits in share-holding companies, and highlighted proposals of the antimonopoly body designed to counter such concerns.

Head of FAS specialized Department gave statistics on investigating complaints regarding ‘for disposal” tenders. It relates to tenders for lease or sale of land plots in state (municipal) property, privatization, disposal of property of debtors and bankrupts, etc. Today there are 66 different tender procedures, regulated by 30 federal laws and 23 by-laws (the Land Code, the Forestry Code, the laws on privatization, bankruptcy, enforcement procedures, etc.) 54 procedures do not provide for electronic tenders, the remaining 12 procedures can be performed electronically but there are not clear and unified requirements for operators of electronic sites.

“The current situation leads to abusing by tender organizers and site operators, the number of whim is increasing every year. The system of public tender needs “rebooting”: a unified procedures for electronic tenders and on national electronic sites should be developed”, pointed out Oleg Korneev.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide