17-05-2019 | 15:27

Mobile operators created discriminatory conditions for private companies


On 13 May 2019, the Federal Antimonopoly Service found that “MTS” PJSC, “T2Mobile” Ltd. and “VimpelCom” PJSC violated the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.


Based on the results of the investigation, the Antimonopoly Service established that contracts conditions for private companies were different from contract conditions for companies with state participation in their capital.


The Antimonopoly Service exposed that difference could reach up to 10 times, since companies with the state share can pay several times less than private companies. This circumstance creates discriminatory conditions and is violating the antimonopoly law.


One of the examples, in particular, informational, service and transaction SMS-messaging by banks.


FAS has recognized that “MTS” PJSC, “T2Mobile” Ltd. and “VimpelCom” PJSC violated the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” in the part of creating discriminatory conditions when consumers of sms-messaging service are put in unequal conditions (Clause 8 Part 1 Article 10).


FAS also established a violation of Clause 1 Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”: fixing monopolistically high prices for sms-messaging service.


Apart from that, actions of “VimpelCom” PJSC to abolish transliteration of sms-messages from Cyrillic to Latin characters, doubled the costs of sms-messaging, while such actions of the operator were not justified. FAS classified them under Clause 3 Part 1 Article 10 of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.


The Antimonopoly Service will issue a prescription to “MTS” PJSC, “T2Mobile” Ltd. and “VimpelCom” PJSC to eliminate violations of the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” that are also liable under Article 14.31 of the Code on Antimonopoly Violations.


The case against “Megaphone” PJSC is suspended until 16 May 2019.


“It is worth reminding that last year FAS issued a warning to the 4 big mobile operators to eliminate the signs of violations. Having analyzed the materials received form operators, FAS concluded that the companies failed to execute the warning, the result of which was confirming violations committed by three communications operators”, pointed out Deputy Head of FAS Anatoly Golomolzin.

Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Media Releases Image Library About the FAS Russia What We Do General Information Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Institutional Memory Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings GCR Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements International Working Groups Working Group on Research of Competition Issues in the Market of International Telecommunications (Roaming) Meetings Working Group for Studying Competition Problems in the Pharmaceutical Sector Concept Note Meetings OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 13th session IGE UNCTAD Resolution Russian contributions 14th session IGE UNCTAD Resolution Russian contributions 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS WG (Markets of Social Importance) EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Archive Working Group on Investigating Issues on Pricing in the Oil and Oil Product Markets and Methods of their Functioning Meetings Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide