CASE ON SEAL-AND-LOCK DEVICES IS INCLUDED IN THE RATING OF THE BEST CASES – 2018

11-06-2019 | 17:15

Based on the case outcome, competition was restored on the markets of selling seal-and-lock-devices

 

From 2008, manufacturers of seal-and-lock devices concluded and participated in an anticompetitive agreement that purpose of which was to fix and maintain prices and divide the market by scope of sales and the categories of buyers of seal-and-lock devices used for railway transportation.

 

FAS found that “STRAZH” IPK” JSC, “Trans-Plombir” Ltd., “SotekKomCentre” Ltd., “KZMI” TD Ltd. and “OTsV” CJSC violated the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.

 

“OTsV” CJSC coordinated operations of seal-and-lock devices manufacturers in order to fix prices for some of their types.

 

Using special software, the cartel members and the coordinator were actively exchanging information enabling to control the lifecycle of any seal-and-lock device from production, sale to disposal. The special software was located in the premises of “OTsV” CJSC. All cartel members had access to the software and could entry data and control competitors’ activities.

 

In the course of the inspections, FAS found communications between cartel members and documents according to which the cartel regularly coordinated the volumes of production and sales, client-allocation tables and other evidence. Written instructions from the coordinator to the market players were found that resulted in increasing prices for particular types of seal-and-lock devices.

 

Courts of three instances confirmed legitimacy of the actions undertaken by the Antimonopoly Service.

 

Administrative cases are opened against all respondents.

 

FAS suppressed operations of the cartel that existed around 10 years and controlled the entire market. The break-up of the cartel resulted in reducing procurement prices for end-consumers by two-three times.

 

* Decisions on entering in the list of the best cases are made by FAS Presidium.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide