FAS IN THE MEDIA: THE COURT REJECTED THE BOOKING.COM APPEAL

12-11-2021 | 17:44

The Ninth Arbitration Appeal Court dismissed Booking.com's appeal of the Moscow Arbitration Court’s decision, which had previously confirmed the legality of FAS’s infringement decision. This is provided in the materials of arbitration cases file.

The message states: ‘To keep the Court’s decision as it stands and to reject the appeal’.

At the end of August, the Moscow Arbitration Court dismissed Booking.com's appeal of FAS’s decision regarding the exclusion of broad and narrow parity clauses from Booking.com’s agreements with hotels, applying to both, the prices for hotel services and the conditions under which these services are provided.

Booking.com is planning to appeal the decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal, as the company's press service told to TASS.

‘As a law-abiding company, we will work to cease parity clauses in Russia but at the same time we will prepare the appeal of today’s decision’, - the press service said.

The company is disappointed with today's decision, which in its view does not fully take into account the data provided by the platform on the market conditions and the industry's perceptions of parity clauses.

‘Parity clauses are necessary to prevent hotels from being able to enjoy all the services of our platform for free and then deliberately display unequal and higher prices on Booking.com, incentivizing customers to book rooms directly. This is not only unfair but also not in the travelers’ interests’, - the company said.

About the case

In December 2020, FAS initiated a case against Booking.com due to the imposition of parity condition on hotels and hostels. According to FAS, the service did not allow connected hotels to reduce prices on other channels. The company did not agree with FAS’s decision and filed an appeal on February 4, 2021.

On August 26, FAS fined Booking.com with the amount of 1.3 billion rubles for the abuse of its dominant position in the relevant Russian market. Subsequently, Booking.com appealed the fine to Moscow Arbitration Court.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide