Arbitration Court confirmed FAS conclusions on substitutability of medicinal drugs with different pharmaceutical forms

05-12-2016 | 11:59

FAS managed to prevent an attempt to register a vital drug at the price 8 times higher than the maximum registered price for an analogue

On 29 November 2016, Moscow District Arbitration Court pronounced legitimacy of a refusal by the Federal Antimonopoly service (FAS Russia) to approve the ceiling ex-works price for the “Clotrimazole” medicinal drug (the International Non-Proprietary Name - Clotrimazole) manufactured by “Anzhero-Sudzhenky Chemical-and-Pharmaceutical Works” Ltd. Thus, the Arbitration Court dismissed a cassation appeal.

The reason for FAS refusal was that the price applied for state registration had been 8 times higher than the registered prices for the analogue drugs. The FAS was decision formed the grounds for the Ministry of Health Care to refuse state registration of the ceiling ex-works prices of the “Clotrimazole” medicinal drug.

FAS established and the Ministry of Health Care confirmed the equivalency of various pharmaceutical forms, enabling to compare prices, applied by “Anzhero-Sudzhenky Chemical-and-Pharmaceutical Works” for state registration, with the earlier registered prices for equivalent drugs of other manufacturers.

“We established that to increase price tenfold the manufacturer withdrew the earlier registered price for the medicinal drug (18 RUB) less than a month before filing documents to register the overrated price (183 RUB). The attempt of the manufacturer to increase the drug price was prevented successfully. The Court supported the decisions of the antimonopoly body and the Ministry of Health Care not to register the unreasonably overrated “Clotrimazole” price, based on the norms of the Law on medicinal drugs circulation  and confirmed by the clinical studies’ findings”, emphasized Deputy Head of FAS Department for Control over Social Sphere and Trade, Maxim Dyagterev.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide