FAS Russia reached a settlement with container carriers

21-02-2017 | 09:38

On 13 February 2017 the 9th Arbitration Appeal Court approved the settlement

In 2013 FAS opened a case against A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S (Denmark), CMACGMSA (France), Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., LTD (Korea), Orient Overseas Container Line Limited (Hong Kong), Evergreen Marine Corp. Ltd. (Taiwan) upon sighs of violating the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition”.

FAS concluded that the companies performed prohibited concerted actions, which resulted in fixing mark-ups to freight rates on the market of liner container carriage, thus, violating the antimonopoly law of the Russian Federation.

As for the settlement conditions, the carriers stopped the violation and undertook obligations, executing which will enable compliance with the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” and fair conditions for consumers of container shipping services.

“Reaching a settlement is the most efficient way to restore fair competition rules on the market of liner container transportation”, said Deputy Head of FAS Sergey Puzyrevskiy.

Holding the companies administratively liable, FAS considered their actions aimed a competition support as mitigating circumstances.

Currently, the Antimonopoly Service, together with the market participants, is devising the “Guidelines” to determine the common conduct rules and principles on the market of liner marine transportation.

It must be noted that cases against liner container shippers are investigated by many foreign jurisdictions.

“Investigating the case, the Antimonopoly Service took into consideration foreign experience, particularly, the European Commission, where a case against liner container shippers also was regulated with a settlement. We hope that experience of investigating cases against the companies by FAS will be useful for our foreign colleagues in their own investigations on this market”, emphasized Head of FAS Igor Artemiev.



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide