SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION SUPPORTED FAS POSITION

27-11-2023 | 18:18

The relevant letter of the Authority (1) is recognized legal and consistent to the Procurement Law (2)

The state-owned company tried to challenge the legality of this letter from FAS Russia. In its view, it was within its rights to establish such a procedure for evaluating the bids of procurement participants who are on different taxation systems, in which their price proposals will be evaluated based on their reduction to a single basis.

At the same time, VAT is actually deducted from the price offer of the participant applying the general taxation system. It leads to an artificial reduction in the price offered by the participant. As a result, such a counterparty is recognized by the customer as more preferable.

However, based on the literal interpretation of the provisions of the Procurement Law (3), the procedure for evaluating applications should apply equally to all participants.

The FAS Russia notes that customers – state-owned companies are guided by the principles of the Procurement Law. These include equality, fairness, non-discrimination and unreasonable restrictions on competition in relation to procurement participants.

According to the Authority, such actions of state-owned companies initially put entrepreneurs who lawfully apply various taxation systems in an unequal position. It leads to discrimination and creation of preferential conditions for participants in the general taxation system.

The Supreme Court sided with the FAS and confirmed the legitimacy of the Authority`s position.

  

(1) Letter of the FAS Russia of August 22, 2018 No. АД/66562/18 “On the issue of establishing requirements for participants applying various taxation systems (reduction or increase of the proposed maximum initial price for the amount of VAT)”

(2) Federal Law of July 18, 2011 No. 223-FZ “On Procurement of Goods, Works, Services by Individual Types of Legal Entities”

(3) Part 6 of the Article 3 of the Procurement Law



Site Map

News & Events Press Releases Image Library About FAS Russia What We Do Institutional Memory Mission, Goals, Values Priority Setting Stakeholders Engagement Center for Education and Methodics Our History Our Structure Powers of Head and Deputy Heads Our Ratings Using our website International Cooperation Treaties & Agreements OECD Competition Committee OECD meetings 2013 OECD meetings 2014 OECD meetings 2015 OECD meetings 2016 OECD meetings 2017 OECD meetings 2018 OECD meetings 2019 OECD meetings 2020 OECD meetings 2021 FAS Annual Reports OECD-GVH RCC RCC Newsletter Projects ICAP Council on Advertising Headquarters for Joint Investigations UNCTAD 15th session IGE UNCTAD 16th session IGE UNCTAD 17th session IGE UNCTAD 18th session IGE UNCTAD 8th UN Conference on Competition 19th session IGE UNCTAD 20th session IGE UNCTAD 21th session IGE UNCTAD EEU Model Law on Competition ICN BRICS BRICS Conferences Documents BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre BRICS Working Groups for the Research of Competition Issues in Socially Important markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Pharmaceutical Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Food Value Chains Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Automobile Markets Working Group for the Research of Competition Issues in the Digital Markets BRICS Coordination Committee on antimonopoly policy EU APEC Competition Policy and Law Group Annual meetings Projects ERRA Full Members Organizational Structure Document Library Legislation Reports & Analytics Cases & decisions COVID-19 Contacts Give feedback Contact us Links Authorities Worldwide